<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to Set Facebook Ad Goals for Phenomenal Results	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Angelos Perlegkas		</title>
		<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-56</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angelos Perlegkas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://karolakarlson.com/?p=396#comment-56</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-55&quot;&gt;Karola Karlson&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you. Keep up the good work. Just make sure you try it at a 10 + relevancy scored campaign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-55">Karola Karlson</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you. Keep up the good work. Just make sure you try it at a 10 + relevancy scored campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karola Karlson		</title>
		<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-55</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karola Karlson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://karolakarlson.com/?p=396#comment-55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-52&quot;&gt;Angelos Perlegkas&lt;/a&gt;.

I see your point and I believe that it could work. I might even run a test the promoting the next blog post coming up on Wednesday ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-52">Angelos Perlegkas</a>.</p>
<p>I see your point and I believe that it could work. I might even run a test the promoting the next blog post coming up on Wednesday 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Angelos Perlegkas		</title>
		<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-52</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angelos Perlegkas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://karolakarlson.com/?p=396#comment-52</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-51&quot;&gt;Karola Karlson&lt;/a&gt;.

You are absolutely right concerning objective. I usually roll with small budgets, but there is some content spread across different mediums that generate true virality, which then gives back lots of feedback - data. 

At that point I find that there&#039;s a sweet spot of virality where objective kind of holds you back. For example, if you promote a blog link with the link clicks objective, the algorithm will show this to part of your audience that tends to click more, which means that it will probably cut down on reach, or other engagement (likes for example).

There are those unicorn posts or campaigns that go viral, and make the objective redundant, then you might need to optimise for reach, because more exposure will give you an excellent mix of everything. For example, a new blog trying to making it big with a viral piece of article will be able to maximize clicks, page likes (invites from likes), engagement, and awareness with a very low budget. 

This is probably true for that really small 1%, the one in 100 posts, but I &#039;ve seen it happen a couple of times nonetheless, and it&#039;s beautiful!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-51">Karola Karlson</a>.</p>
<p>You are absolutely right concerning objective. I usually roll with small budgets, but there is some content spread across different mediums that generate true virality, which then gives back lots of feedback &#8211; data. </p>
<p>At that point I find that there&#8217;s a sweet spot of virality where objective kind of holds you back. For example, if you promote a blog link with the link clicks objective, the algorithm will show this to part of your audience that tends to click more, which means that it will probably cut down on reach, or other engagement (likes for example).</p>
<p>There are those unicorn posts or campaigns that go viral, and make the objective redundant, then you might need to optimise for reach, because more exposure will give you an excellent mix of everything. For example, a new blog trying to making it big with a viral piece of article will be able to maximize clicks, page likes (invites from likes), engagement, and awareness with a very low budget. </p>
<p>This is probably true for that really small 1%, the one in 100 posts, but I &#8216;ve seen it happen a couple of times nonetheless, and it&#8217;s beautiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karola Karlson		</title>
		<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-51</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karola Karlson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://karolakarlson.com/?p=396#comment-51</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-50&quot;&gt;Angelos Perlegkas&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Angelos.

Good point!
Have you tried optimizing for reach vs. post engagement vs. clicks?

As far as our A/B tests go, we&#039;ve always seen better results when optimizing for engagement with blog articles (that&#039;s the goal we want when sharing our articles) vs. reach.

If your article reaches many people but non of them engage with the ad, it&#039;s not very helpful. Even if the article has a potential of virality, I&#039;d say it&#039;s smart to optimize for the final goal – engagement or link clicks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-50">Angelos Perlegkas</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Angelos.</p>
<p>Good point!<br />
Have you tried optimizing for reach vs. post engagement vs. clicks?</p>
<p>As far as our A/B tests go, we&#8217;ve always seen better results when optimizing for engagement with blog articles (that&#8217;s the goal we want when sharing our articles) vs. reach.</p>
<p>If your article reaches many people but non of them engage with the ad, it&#8217;s not very helpful. Even if the article has a potential of virality, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s smart to optimize for the final goal – engagement or link clicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Angelos Perlegkas		</title>
		<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-50</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angelos Perlegkas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://karolakarlson.com/?p=396#comment-50</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While the article is absolutely spot on, there are some times (especially in really well performing campaigns), that optimizing for reach and impressions might yield even better results (example being a viral piece of article).

If your audience is highly relevant, and your content/offer/creative particularly strong, optimising for an objective might result in the algorithm holding back on your potential reach.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the article is absolutely spot on, there are some times (especially in really well performing campaigns), that optimizing for reach and impressions might yield even better results (example being a viral piece of article).</p>
<p>If your audience is highly relevant, and your content/offer/creative particularly strong, optimising for an objective might result in the algorithm holding back on your potential reach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karola Karlson		</title>
		<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-18</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karola Karlson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2017 06:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://karolakarlson.com/?p=396#comment-18</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-17&quot;&gt;Mony Chhim&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Mony! ??

Hope you&#039;ll see great Facebook ad results!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-17">Mony Chhim</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Mony! ??</p>
<p>Hope you&#8217;ll see great Facebook ad results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mony Chhim		</title>
		<link>https://karolakarlson.com/facebook-ad-goals/#comment-17</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mony Chhim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://karolakarlson.com/?p=396#comment-17</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice reminder about focusing on the right metrics/goals. I&#039;ll definitely keep that in mind!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice reminder about focusing on the right metrics/goals. I&#8217;ll definitely keep that in mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
